Saturday, September 27, 2014

3 Dekad Berlalu

PUISI ANAK TEKNIKA '83

Sehening February 1983
titis titis keramat embun dinihari, mula dijamah kilauan suria pagi
Tatkala pinggir-pinggir kotaraya,
Tenteram menyambut kita tiba,

Anak-anak bangsa
wajah-wajah segar penuh azam nan membara
bakal wirawan dan wirawati negara
bakal meredah ruang maya, ilmu dan cipta
tekad merebut cebis-cebis riwayat masa
mengisi fakta pada ruang-ruang di jemala
diiring berkat doa keluarga tercinta

TIKL menghampar diri,
terbuka dengan rela dan redha menatang dada
menongkat tatih-tatih berani kita
anak-anak jati,
pada erti ilmu kepalang ajar
pada erti setia hidup dan cinta
Seiringan dihidang gelak tawa
menjamah zaman remaja
menghirup nafas-nafas budaya
gagah gemalai membuka mata

Guru-guru, pengetua, warden asrama
bengis manja meminta setia kita
pada runut-runut ilmu yang dijaja
menjengah ruang cebisan riwayat kini berirama
sedia mengharung alam dewasa

namun,
kalungan doa rakan-rakan yang gugur
ibarat bunga-bunga yang belum kembang
kembali pada Illahi menyerah fana

kini
lihat anak-anak Teknika itu,
di sini, waktu dan ketika ini
kamu semua
bergenang mengimbau kenangan sepintas drama
keinsafan pada masa-masa berlalu
pegun sejenak

bangun anak-anak Teknika dewasa
lihatlah dunia

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Repvblik - Sandiwara Cinta ( New Version )



Aku tahu ini semua tak adil
Aku tahu ini sudah terjadi
Mau bilang apa aku pun tak sanggup
Air mata pun tak lagi mau menetes

Alasannya seringkali ku dengar
Alasannya seringkali kau ucap
Kau dengannya seakan ku tak tahu
Sandiwara apa yang telah kau lakukan kepadaku

Jujurlah sayang aku tak mengapa
Biar semua jelas telah berbeda
Jika nanti aku yang harus pergi
Ku terima walau sakit hati

Mungkin ini jalan yang engkau mau
Mungkin ini jalan yang kau inginkan
Kau dengannya seakan ku tak tahu
Sandiwara apa, ceritanya apa, aku tahu

Jujurlah sayang aku tak mengapa
Biar semua jelas telah berbeda
Jika nanti aku yang harus pergi
Ku terima walau sakit hati

Jujurlah sayang aku tak mengapa
Biar semua jelas telah berbeda
Jika nanti aku yang harus pergi
Ku terima walau sakit hati
Ku terima walau sakit hati

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Face reality – tell the truth | theSundaily

R.Nadeswaran
MORE than seven years ago – in October 2006, to be precise, – I sent this stinker of a message to then domestic trade and consumer affairs minister, Datuk Mohd Shafie Apdal, in one of my columns:
"If you are invited for tea at the Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Ministry or by its officials, you'd be better off declining it. That's because the ministry and its officials are trying to tell us to use one tea bag for every 10 cups of tea! Not exactly though, but by words to that effect.
"The minister, in his festive season message via a full-page advertorial, suggests that consumers should 'minimise the use of ingredients such as sugar and flour by making cookies with less of such ingredients'.
How the heck do you make cookies without the right amount of ingredients? The advertorial is not the only media the ministry is spending on. Why are our civil servants making the minister look stupid with such unkind statements?
It is no intention of this writer to recycle old stories, but in view of the price increase and the hardship faced by the people, similar statements reflecting on ignorance, lack of knowledge and unawareness transcend into shades of stupidity and folly.
The message is simple – stop giving the people false hopes by "threatening" traders or retailers who raise prices because there are no laws which prevent them from raising prices.
Please do not give false hopes to consumers by making all kinds of statements and promises. If you don't deliver or are unable to keep them, you make the rakyat even angrier. Talk about sending hundreds of enforcement officers out to the field to "check on increases" is nothing but pure bunkum!
If your officers have not already briefed you, allow me to enlighten you. Let is be categorically stated that our system is one of free enterprise – willing buyer-willing seller at a price agreed upon. If the buyer cannot agree on the price, he chooses another source.
The government will not and does not fix prices of raw or cooked food, or that matter any commodity. The fixing of petrol and diesel prices is merely an administrative arrangement between the government and the oil companies.
The price of a cup of tea varies from location to location. It may cost RM1.20 in a stall; perhaps RM2 in a restaurant; RM12 in an up market shopping mall and even RM20 in a five-star hotel.
So, if the stall operator increases his price to RM1.50, does it amount to profiteering? No, but he has committed an offence if he does not have a board listing the prices of the food that is on sale at his stall. Well, that's another law altogether – not related to profiteering. This law gives the consumer a choice to look and compare prices before making a purchase or placing an order.
There is no law against profiteering. Period.
If there is any, then the ministry should first ask the hoteliers to justify why some of them charge RM40 for mamak mee – 10 times more than the average restaurant. Of course, patrons are paying for the ambience, décor and the service.
So, stop giving consumers false hopes. We have to accept that the price increases are going to hurt all of us who earn an honest living without backhanders, coffee money and other forms of inducement above and below the table.
People must face reality but in our case, not very long ago in the many speeches, announcements, assurances, proclamations and chest-thumping promises, the various parties gave undertakings of a different kind. They guaranteed that they would bring down prices if they were voted into power.
Having achieved that, it is their onerous duty and ultimate responsibility to honour their words and deeds. They cannot run away from the fact that they can do nothing to arrest the series of price increases triggered by the withdrawal of subsidies.
They now cannot fall back and make more empty promises such as "we will go after profiteers" which they will never be able to do. This is the price we are paying for the monopolistic trades and systems of business that have been created in the past for the benefit of a few.
At every turn, important commodities and staple food are in the hands of a few. It is not too late to open the markets for healthy competition.
The government and its officials must stop making statements which underestimate the intelligence of the people. Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD) chairman Tan Sri Syed Hamid Albar's quick "cure" for the demand by school bus operators to raise prices is allowing parent-teacher associations (PTAs) to operate school buses.
Is he in Malaysia or another planet? You don't go and buy buses off the rack. You order the chassis and engine and subsequently the coach is built according to specifications.
But that aside, how could he have imagined that PTAs have that kind of money to invest in a bus or several buses? It is agreed that time-tabling and collection of monthly fees can be done, but what about maintenance of buses, keeping spares, etc? A bus is not a car which you send to the neighbourhood garage for oil and filter change and carry on driving.
We need a concerted effort to keep in check the effects of spiralling prices. We can do without pledges that cannot be kept. These are not election promises, some of which can be written on running water and no one cares.
The issue of price increases hits everyone where it hurts and a permanent solution must be found instead of political rhetoric.

Saturday, January 11, 2014

Figures don’t add up | theSundaily

OVER the Chinese New Year holiday period, a group of friends are arriving from the United Kingdom for a short holiday, en route to Shanghai. In June, a family of five from London will visit our shores for a two-week break.
They will be staying in a serviced apartment and that's a small contribution to the Visit Malaysia Year programme launched last Saturday.
Every Malaysian is expected to do his or her part and a good part of December was spent trying to persuade friends in the UK to come over, in the hope that their hospitality can be reciprocated.
I don't know whether these fewer than a dozen people will make any significant change to the projected 28 million visitors spending a whopping RM76 billion during their stay here.
What is the basis of considering someone a "tourist"? The World Tourism Organisation defines tourists as people "travelling to and staying in places outside their usual environment for not more than one consecutive year for leisure, business and other purposes".
Let it be stated that the figures propagated by Tourism Malaysia are neither being disputed nor challenged, but there has to be an explanation as to how they are worked out, especially with the dispensation of the disembarkation cards at arrival terminals.
Previously, visitors would have to fill details of their purpose of visit, the duration of stay, etc which will enable proper statistics to be worked out. With our Immigration Department going biometric with a view to going paperless, it is certainly a reasonable question that ought to be asked.
Again for various unexplained expediencies, figures are spewed out which makes one wonder if someone is pulling something out of a hat. For example, the director of Tourism Malaysia in Beijing, Noran Ujang, said that Malaysia is expected to attract two million Chinese tourist arrivals in conjunction with the Visit Malaysia Year.
But statistics being figures, they can sometimes be mind-boggling. How were such numbers arrived at? The arithmetic does not seem to work out – logically. Two million divided by 365 days (in a year) averages 5,479 Chinese tourists coming in daily to Malaysia.
This means on the average again, this works out to 10 Airbus 380s landing daily in our airports carrying people from China. Is this possible or are they taking a slow boat across the South China Sea?
More questions as more figures are churned out in the name of tourism. Does the 28 million include the 12 million-odd Singaporeans who cross over every year? Do they include the "walk-in" crowd at our border checkpoints in Padang Besar and Sungai Golok?
Do they comprise the hundreds of thousands of foreign workers who enter the country?
These questions have to be emphasised because in 2007, the Selangor Government in its imprudent attempt to declare itself as "fully-developed state", counted itself as receiving several million tourists. The reasoning was that the KL International Airport and Port Klang, the sea gateway to the country, were in Selangor.
The former tourism minister, Datuk Dr Ng Yen Yen, at the launch of a watch exhibition in September 2011 said: "Since 2008, we have been welcoming more than two million tourists every December. Last year alone, 'A Journey through Time' brought in over 1 million visitors from more than 30 countries ..."
Going by her claims, I had reason to comment: "If one million people visited an exhibition held over 10 days, it would mean that on the average, there were 100,000 visitors each day. If these visitors were foreigners, and on the average, if a plane carried 300 passengers each, it would have needed 334 planes to land every day at the KLIA.
Given that airports operate an average of 18 hours each day, it would have meant that about 19 planes would have touched down each hour or one every three minutes."
I am walking down memory lane not to ridicule anyone but to reiterate the fact that such incredulous figures make a mockery of our tourism promotional activities.
Like all Malaysians, this writer wants more tourists on our shores to justify the vast amounts invested in promoting Malaysia. However, the expenditure must commensurate with the results. By providing unauthenticated figures, we are merely feeding misinformation.
By the way, how was the figure RM76 billion arrived at? Going by the figures, each of the 28 million men, women and child visiting Malaysia would have to spend RM2,700 each. Is this plausible?
R. Nadeswaran has been involved and been a keen observer of the tourism trade since Visit Malaysia Year 1984. Comments: citizen-nades@thesundaily.com